000			01369pab a2200193 454500
008			180718b2011 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aMalik, Lokendra
245			_aRight to health as a fundamental right in India: A critique
260			_c2011
300			_ap.317-319.
362			_aApr-Jun
520			_aProvision of adequate health care facilities for the people is an essential obligation upon the government in a welfare state like India. The Apex court has also held that the right to live with human dignity is enshrined in the Article 21 of the constitution, which derives its life and breath from the Directive Principles of State Policy particularly Article 39 (e) & (f) and 41 and 42 and would therefore include protection of health as envisaged in the directives. This connotation of right to life is wholly justified, for, without health of a person being protected and his well-being looked after, it would be impossible for him to enjoy other fundamental rights. From time to time courts have provided redressal by a meaningful and just interpretation and the right to life and commanding enforcement of the duties of a welfare state. - Reproduced.
650			_aHealth services - India
650			_aRight to health - India
650			_aRight to health
773			_aIndian Journal of Public Administration
908			_aN
909			_a92629
999			_c92629 _d92629