| 000 | 01242pab a2200181 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b2012 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aCarpenter, Daniel P. | ||
| 245 | _aReputation and public administration | ||
| 260 | _c2012 | ||
| 300 | _ap.26-32. | ||
| 362 | _aJan - Feb | ||
| 520 | _aThis article examines the application of organizational reputation to public administration. Organizational reputation is defined as a set of beliefs about an organization's capacities, intentions, history, and mission that are embedded in a network of multiple audiences. The authors assert that the way in which organizational reputations are formed and subsequently cultivated is fundamental to understanding the role of public administration in a democracy. A review of the basic assumptions and empirical work on organizational reputation in the public sector identifies a series of stylized facts that extends our understanding of the functioning of public agencies. In particular, the authors examine the relationship between organizational reputation and bureaucratic autonomy. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 | _aPublic administration | ||
| 700 | _aKrause, George A. | ||
| 773 | _aPublic Administration Review | ||
| 908 | _aN | ||
| 909 | _a96221 | ||
| 999 |
_c96221 _d96221 |
||