000			01495pab a2200193 454500
008			180718b2012 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aFeeney, Mary K.
245			_aRealized publicness at public and private research universities
260			_c2012
300			_ap.272-284.
362			_aMar - Apr
520			_aAlthough research-extensive universities in the United States produce similar outcomes-research, teaching, and service-they vary substantially in terms of the publicness of their environments. In this article, the authors adopt a public values framework to examine how regulative, normative/associative, and cultural cognitive components affect realized public outcomes by faculty. Using survey data from a random sample of faculty scientists in six fields of science and engineering at Carnegie Research I universities, findings show that organizational and individual public values components are associated predictably with different realized individual public outcomes. For example, individual support from federal resources and affiliation with a federal lab (associative) are related to increased research outcomes, while tuition and fee levels (regulative) explain teaching outcomes, and perceived level of influence in the workplace (cultural cognitive) explains teaching and service outcomes. - Reproduced.
650			_aUniversities
650			_aResearch
700			_aWelch, Eric W.
773			_aPublic Administration Review
908			_aN
909			_a96257
999			_c96257 _d96257