| 000 | 01281pab a2200169 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b2012 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aRyan, Bill | ||
| 245 | _aCo-production: Option or obligation? | ||
| 260 | _c2012 | ||
| 300 | _ap.314-324. | ||
| 362 | _aSep | ||
| 520 | _aCo-production is an idea being discussed in the international public management literature but less so in New Zealand and Australia. Co-production rejects the idea of service delivery to passive users, proposing instead they be treated as active participants in the production of outcomes. As partners in delivery, users bring resources, skills and capabilities to their interactions with providers. Co-production requires providers to share power and negotiate the interaction. There are strong managerial reasons for adopting co-production to improve effectiveness and efficiency. But the political reasons for adopting co-production are even stronger because of trends of many decades towards greater citizen participparticipation. These reasons oblige public managers in Australasia to adopt co-production in many fields of policy as part of the future. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 | _aPublic administration | ||
| 773 | _aAustralian Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 908 | _aN | ||
| 909 | _a97651 | ||
| 999 |
_c97650 _d97650 |
||