000			01518pab a2200181 454500
008			180718b2013 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aCalista, Donald J.
245			_aDigitized government among countries worldwide from 2003 to 2010. Performance discrepancies explained by comparing frameworks
260			_c2013
300			_ap.227-234.
362			_aFeb
520			_aPublic sector researchers largely portray digitized government as following a maturational movement that will ultimately sustain electronic democracy. An alternate view maintains that digitized government reflects broader public policies that drift and change over time; as a result, it embraces two discrete curvilinear processes-e-government and e-governance. This study compares these differing frameworks by employing successive evaluations published by theUnited Nations of member Web sites from 2003 to 2010. Partitioning appears in the findings. Countries worldwide are pushing the aggregate means higher for digitized government. Yet, disaggregate best practices among early-adopter countries exhibit significantvariability, including in industrialized societies. The findings doubt the maturational view as they bear out the curvilinear construct. The conclusions demonstrate that the potential for an electronic transformation abates before the Great Recession. - Reproduced.
650			_aE governance
700			_aMelitski, James
773			_aInternational Journal of Public Administration
908			_aN
909			_a99446
999			_c99445 _d99445