Smart contracts & blockchain: The panacea to the unequal bargaining power of consumers? (Record no. 514467)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02152nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 201106b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Rab, Ajar. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Smart contracts & blockchain: The panacea to the unequal bargaining power of consumers? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | International Journal on Consumer Law and practice |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 8, 2020: p.40-58 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | The growing use of technology, apps, and internet-of-things is pushing innocent consumers to the bottom of the chain when it comes to freely negotiated contracts. Consumers click ‘I agree’ without knowing the terms and conditions of the contract. However, this rise in technology may ‘hold the cure to the unequal bargaining power in standard form consumer contracts. This paper highlights the current issues existing in consumer law jurisprudence and explains blockchain or decentralized Léger technology, and smart contracts. The paper argues that he application of such technologies, especially riparian contracts, has the potential to level the playing field and provide equal bargaining power to consumers, without comprising their privacy. It surveys the current use of such technology in areas of insurance, flight compensation and service contracts and demonstrates how issues of consent, legal certainty and enforcement of consumer rights can be better addressed by blockhain and smart contracts. The paper argues that such technologies foster trust, confidentiality, and efficiency and remove jurisdictional barriers in international trade and commerce. However, before such technologies con is given legal sanction for in the area of consumer law, many legal thresholds and statutory requirements will have to be revamped by legislatures. It concludes that blackhain and smart contracts can half in creating freely negotiated consumer contracts if consumer rights receive support from policymakers. – Reproduced |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Bitcoin, Blockchain, Decentralized Leger technology, Smart contracts, IoT, Privacy, Ricardian contract, etc. |
| 9 (RLIN) | 19159 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | International Journal on Consumer Law and practice |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) | |
| Subject DIP | BITCOIN |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2020-11-06 | 8, 2020: p. 40-58 | AR123468 | 2020-11-06 | Articles |