| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01377nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
210727b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Yan, Bo et al |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Why do countries respond differently to Covid-19? A comparative study of Sweden, China, France, and Japan |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
|---|
| Place of publication, distribution, etc |
American Review of Public Administration |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
50(6-7), Aug-Oct, 2020: p.762-769 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc |
Nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are important public health tools to fight against COVID-19. Governments around the world have instituted a variety of NPIs to modify individuals’ behavior, giving rise to four distinct pandemic response strategies: nudge, mandate, decree, and boost. To better understand the different policy choices involved in these strategies, four countries including Sweden, China, France, and Japan were compared to identify the critical institutional and cultural determinants of national response strategy. The finding shows that various responses regarding same threat are dependent on the distinctive institutional arrangements and cultural orientation of each country, and thus, there is no One-Size-Fits-All strategy. – Reproduced |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
COVID-19, Institutional arrangements, Cultural orientation, Response strategy |
| 9 (RLIN) |
25878 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Main entry heading |
American Review of Public Administration |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) |
|---|
| Subject DIP |
COVID 19 PANDEMIC |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Item type |
Articles |
