Why do countries respond differently to Covid-19? A comparative study of Sweden, China, France, and Japan
By: Yan, Bo et al
.
Material type:
BookPublisher: American Review of Public Administration Description: 50(6-7), Aug-Oct, 2020: p.762-769.Subject(s): COVID-19, Institutional arrangements, Cultural orientation, Response strategy| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | 50(6-7), Aug-Oct, 2020: p.762-769 | Available | AR124999 |
Nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are important public health tools to fight against COVID-19. Governments around the world have instituted a variety of NPIs to modify individuals’ behavior, giving rise to four distinct pandemic response strategies: nudge, mandate, decree, and boost. To better understand the different policy choices involved in these strategies, four countries including Sweden, China, France, and Japan were compared to identify the critical institutional and cultural determinants of national response strategy. The finding shows that various responses regarding same threat are dependent on the distinctive institutional arrangements and cultural orientation of each country, and thus, there is no One-Size-Fits-All strategy. – Reproduced


Articles
There are no comments for this item.