When participation wins votes: Explaining the emergence of large-scale participatory democracy (Record no. 527091)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01820nam a22001577a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 240802b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Abbott, Jared |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | When participation wins votes: Explaining the emergence of large-scale participatory democracy |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | Comparative Politics |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 54(1), Oct, 2021: p.97-122 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | Why are large-scale participatory institutions implemented in some countries but only adopted on paper in others? I argue that nationwide implementation of Binding Participatory Institutions (BPIs)-a critical subtype of participatory institutions-is dependent on the backing of a strong institutional supporter, often a political party. In turn, parties will only implement BPIs if they place a lower value on the political costs than on the potential benefits of implementation. This will be true if: 1) significant societal demand exists for BPI implementation and 2) the party's political opponents cannot take advantage of BPIs for their own gain. I test this theory through two detailed case studies of Venezuela and Ecuador, drawing on 165 interviews with key national-level actors and grassroots activists.- Reproduced https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cuny/cp/2021/00000054/00000001/art00006 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Participatory institutions, Binding participatory institutions, Political parties, Institutional support, Political costs, Implementation benefits, Societal demand, Opposition strategy, Policy adoption, Venezuela case study, Ecuador case study, Grassroots activism, National-level actors, Comparative politics, Democratic innovation, Institutional backing, Political incentives, Governance reform, Interview-based research, Paper implementation |
| 9 (RLIN) | 56259 |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | Comparative Politics |
| 906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) | |
| Subject DIP | DEMOCRACY |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2024-08-02 | 54(1), Oct, 2021: p.97-122 | AR132555 | 2024-08-02 | Articles |