Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Contractual and relational governance as positioned-practices in ongoing public-private partnership projects

By: Avial, Camilo Benitez, Hartmann, Andreas and Dewulf, Geert.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: Project Management Journal Description: 50(6), Dec, 2019: p.716-733.Subject(s): Public–Private partnerships, Positioned-Practices, Project governance, Contractual governance, Relational governance In: Project Management Journal Summary: This article introduces a process framework based on the realist social theory for studying governing in ongoing public–private partnerships (PPPs). Contractual and relational practices are defined as activities enacted and re-created by virtue of actors’ dual positions: at both the partnership and the parent organizational levels. In PPPs, complementarities and contradictions between public, rule-bureaucratic logic and private, market-oriented logic define structural demands on actors. Nonpredictive and innovative governing activities emerge from the actors’ reflexive capacity to balance different demands. The framework allows the examination of the complex interplay of relational and contractual practices, illustrated in a PPP Dutch case.- Reproduced
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
50(6), 2019: p. 716-733 Available AR123318

This article introduces a process framework based on the realist social theory for studying governing in ongoing public–private partnerships (PPPs). Contractual and relational practices are defined as activities enacted and re-created by virtue of actors’ dual positions: at both the partnership and the parent organizational levels. In PPPs, complementarities and contradictions between public, rule-bureaucratic logic and private, market-oriented logic define structural demands on actors. Nonpredictive and innovative governing activities emerge from the actors’ reflexive capacity to balance different demands. The framework allows the examination of the complex interplay of relational and contractual practices, illustrated in a PPP Dutch case.- Reproduced

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha