Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Allison Elias. The rise of corporate feminism: Women in the American office, 1960–1990

By: Rosenthal, Caitlin.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: Administrative Science Quarterly Description: 69(2), Jun, 2024: p.NP31-NP30. In: Administrative Science QuarterlySummary: Allison Elias’s valuable new book, The Rise of Corporate Feminism, uses the history of secretarial work to explore the complex relationship between capitalism and feminism. Covering the period 1960–1990, Elias argues that although many feminists began with a broad agenda, they ultimately embraced merit-based, gender-blind strategies that aligned with capitalist claims about success and hierarchy. This strategy offered new opportunities for the (mostly White, college-educated) women who were positioned to climb the managerial ladder. Yet, it also allowed occupational segregation by gender to persist, and, along with it, low pay and prestige. Instead of bridging clerical and managerial work, the “feminist principle of equality of opportunity . . . hardened the low-status of the American secretary” (p. 9).- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00018392231222913
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
69(2), Jun, 2024: p.NP31-NP30 R Available AR133585

Allison Elias’s valuable new book, The Rise of Corporate Feminism, uses the history of secretarial work to explore the complex relationship between capitalism and feminism. Covering the period 1960–1990, Elias argues that although many feminists began with a broad agenda, they ultimately embraced merit-based, gender-blind strategies that aligned with capitalist claims about success and hierarchy. This strategy offered new opportunities for the (mostly White, college-educated) women who were positioned to climb the managerial ladder. Yet, it also allowed occupational segregation by gender to persist, and, along with it, low pay and prestige. Instead of bridging clerical and managerial work, the “feminist principle of equality of opportunity . . . hardened the low-status of the American secretary” (p. 9).- Reproduced

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00018392231222913

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha