Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Autonomy or organisation? Reforms in the Ghanaian internal revenue service

By: Joshi, Anuradha.
Contributor(s): Ayee, Joseph.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: 2009Description: p.289-302.Subject(s): Public finance In: Public Administration and DevelopmentSummary: Autonomous Revenue Authorities (ARAs) have recently become a popular organisational reform to improve revenue collection in developing countries. The success of ARAs is commonly attributed to `autonomy' which reduces political interference, and increases financial independence and managerial freedom. This article examines the case of the Ghanaian ARA - the Internal Revenue Service and argues that its strong performance is the result of not `autonomy', but other more nuts and bolts reforms, specifically: (a) strategies designed to direct the focus of the IRS to different taxpayer segments, particularly the informal sector and (b) significant attempts to bring the tax administration closer to the taxpayer through decentralisation and improved taxpayer services. To the extent that autonomy enables ARAs to undertake these other reforms it forms an important piece of the picture, however, they do not require autonomy - they could well be adopted under traditional tax administrations. - Reproduced.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
Volume no: 29, Issue no: 4 Available AR84552

Autonomous Revenue Authorities (ARAs) have recently become a popular organisational reform to improve revenue collection in developing countries. The success of ARAs is commonly attributed to `autonomy' which reduces political interference, and increases financial independence and managerial freedom. This article examines the case of the Ghanaian ARA - the Internal Revenue Service and argues that its strong performance is the result of not `autonomy', but other more nuts and bolts reforms, specifically: (a) strategies designed to direct the focus of the IRS to different taxpayer segments, particularly the informal sector and (b) significant attempts to bring the tax administration closer to the taxpayer through decentralisation and improved taxpayer services. To the extent that autonomy enables ARAs to undertake these other reforms it forms an important piece of the picture, however, they do not require autonomy - they could well be adopted under traditional tax administrations. - Reproduced.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha