Loyalty signaling, bureaucratic compliance, and variation in state repression in authoritarian regimes
By: Qian, Jingyuan and Bai, Steve
.
Material type: 
BookPublisher: Comparative Politics Description: 56(3), Jul, 2024: p.423-447.Subject(s): Anti-rightist campaign, Authoritarian regime, China, Maozedong, Repression
In:
Comparative PoliticsSummary: In autocracies, why are certain bureaucrats more heavy-handed in their use of force than others during repression? In this article, we propose an incentive-compatible theory that explains the uneven compliance of bureaucrats in repressive campaigns. We argue that bureaucrats from less trusted backgrounds tend to implement repressive tasks more fervently to credibly display loyalty and bolster their career prospects. We provide evidence for our theory using China’s Anti-Rightist Campaign (1957‐1959), a repressive campaign launched by Mao Zedong against alleged critics of his rule. We find that officials who were former undercover partisans, a faction considered untrustworthy by Mao, tended to prosecute more “rightists” in their jurisdictions and imposed harsher penalties on them. This study contributes to the literature by revealing the motivations of coercive agents.- Reproduced
https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cuny/cp/2024/00000056/00000004/art00002
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | 56(3), Jul, 2024: p.423-447 | Available | AR133795 |
In autocracies, why are certain bureaucrats more heavy-handed in their use of force than others during repression? In this article, we propose an incentive-compatible theory that explains the uneven compliance of bureaucrats in repressive campaigns. We argue that bureaucrats from less trusted backgrounds tend to implement repressive tasks more fervently to credibly display loyalty and bolster their career prospects. We provide evidence for our theory using China’s Anti-Rightist Campaign (1957‐1959), a repressive campaign launched by Mao Zedong against alleged critics of his rule. We find that officials who were former undercover partisans, a faction considered untrustworthy by Mao, tended to prosecute more “rightists” in their jurisdictions and imposed harsher penalties on them. This study contributes to the literature by revealing the motivations of coercive agents.- Reproduced
https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cuny/cp/2024/00000056/00000004/art00002
There are no comments for this item.