The present and future of public sector extension in Africa: contracting out or contracting in?
By: Anderson, Jon.
Contributor(s): Crowder, L. Van.
Material type:
ArticlePublisher: 2000Description: p.373-84.Subject(s): Public sector - Africa | Public sector
In:
Public Administration and DevelopmentSummary: Public sector extension has come under increasing pressure to downsize and reform. Contracting out - the use of public sector funds to contract non-governmental and private service providers - is often held up as a potential tool in reform efforts. Much has been written about the possible advantages of contracting out of agricultural extension and it is being encouraged and promoted by numerous international organizations. However, a look at field experience in Africa shows that contracting out is relatively infrequent, especially compared with the reverse - contracting in - where private sector and non-governmental organizations finance public sector extension delivery. Case studies from Uganda and Mozambique indicate than on the ground attempts to come up with solutions to providing services to farmers are resulting in innovative contracting approaches and combined public and private institutional arrangements. Contracting in and public-private coalition approaches, in contrast to purely public sector extension (characterized by ineffectiveness and inefficiencies) and purely private for profit extension (which may ignore public goods and concerns), may help achieve extension services which are both demand led and which internalize public concerns such as environmental protection, food security and socio-economic equity. These coalition approaches can be improved and facilitated. They deserve greater analysi s and may contribute to a better understanding of extension contracting and the roles of private and public organizations. - Reproduced
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | Volume no: 20, Issue no: 5 | Available | AR48230 |
Public sector extension has come under increasing pressure to downsize and reform. Contracting out - the use of public sector funds to contract non-governmental and private service providers - is often held up as a potential tool in reform efforts. Much has been written about the possible advantages of contracting out of agricultural extension and it is being encouraged and promoted by numerous international organizations. However, a look at field experience in Africa shows that contracting out is relatively infrequent, especially compared with the reverse - contracting in - where private sector and non-governmental organizations finance public sector extension delivery. Case studies from Uganda and Mozambique indicate than on the ground attempts to come up with solutions to providing services to farmers are resulting in innovative contracting approaches and combined public and private institutional arrangements. Contracting in and public-private coalition approaches, in contrast to purely public sector extension (characterized by ineffectiveness and inefficiencies) and purely private for profit extension (which may ignore public goods and concerns), may help achieve extension services which are both demand led and which internalize public concerns such as environmental protection, food security and socio-economic equity. These coalition approaches can be improved and facilitated. They deserve greater analysi s and may contribute to a better understanding of extension contracting and the roles of private and public organizations. - Reproduced
There are no comments for this item.